1 From db7e2e9ced3df1fb9286946914183f6a074a2b92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
3 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:30:45 -0600
4 Subject: [PATCH 092/124] wireguard: queueing: account for skb->protocol==0
6 commit a5588604af448664e796daf3c1d5a4523c60667b upstream.
8 We carry out checks to the effect of:
10 if (skb->protocol != wg_examine_packet_protocol(skb))
13 By having wg_skb_examine_untrusted_ip_hdr return 0 on failure, this
14 means that the check above still passes in the case where skb->protocol
15 is zero, which is possible to hit with AF_PACKET:
17 struct sockaddr_pkt saddr = { .spkt_device = "wg0" };
18 unsigned char buffer[5] = { 0 };
19 sendto(socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_PACKET, /* skb->protocol = */ 0),
20 buffer, sizeof(buffer), 0, (const struct sockaddr *)&saddr, sizeof(saddr));
22 Additional checks mean that this isn't actually a problem in the code
23 base, but I could imagine it becoming a problem later if the function is
26 I would prefer to fix this by having wg_examine_packet_protocol return a
27 32-bit ~0 value on failure, which will never match any value of
28 skb->protocol, which would simply change the generated code from a mov
29 to a movzx. However, sparse complains, and adding __force casts doesn't
30 seem like a good idea, so instead we just add a simple helper function
31 to check for the zero return value. Since wg_examine_packet_protocol
32 itself gets inlined, this winds up not adding an additional branch to
33 the generated code, since the 0 return value already happens in a
36 Reported-by: Fabian Freyer <fabianfreyer@radicallyopensecurity.com>
37 Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
38 Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
39 Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
41 drivers/net/wireguard/device.c | 2 +-
42 drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h | 8 +++++++-
43 drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c | 4 ++--
44 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
46 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c
47 +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c
48 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t wg_xmit(struct sk_buf
52 - if (unlikely(wg_skb_examine_untrusted_ip_hdr(skb) != skb->protocol)) {
53 + if (unlikely(!wg_check_packet_protocol(skb))) {
54 ret = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
55 net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: Invalid IP packet\n", dev->name);
57 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h
58 +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h
59 @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct packet_cb {
60 #define PACKET_PEER(skb) (PACKET_CB(skb)->keypair->entry.peer)
62 /* Returns either the correct skb->protocol value, or 0 if invalid. */
63 -static inline __be16 wg_skb_examine_untrusted_ip_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb)
64 +static inline __be16 wg_examine_packet_protocol(struct sk_buff *skb)
66 if (skb_network_header(skb) >= skb->head &&
67 (skb_network_header(skb) + sizeof(struct iphdr)) <=
68 @@ -81,6 +81,12 @@ static inline __be16 wg_skb_examine_untr
72 +static inline bool wg_check_packet_protocol(struct sk_buff *skb)
74 + __be16 real_protocol = wg_examine_packet_protocol(skb);
75 + return real_protocol && skb->protocol == real_protocol;
78 static inline void wg_reset_packet(struct sk_buff *skb)
80 skb_scrub_packet(skb, true);
81 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
82 +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
83 @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int prepare_skb_header(struct sk_
84 size_t data_offset, data_len, header_len;
87 - if (unlikely(wg_skb_examine_untrusted_ip_hdr(skb) != skb->protocol ||
88 + if (unlikely(!wg_check_packet_protocol(skb) ||
89 skb_transport_header(skb) < skb->head ||
90 (skb_transport_header(skb) + sizeof(struct udphdr)) >
91 skb_tail_pointer(skb)))
92 @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static void wg_packet_consume_data_done(
94 skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
95 skb->csum_level = ~0; /* All levels */
96 - skb->protocol = wg_skb_examine_untrusted_ip_hdr(skb);
97 + skb->protocol = wg_examine_packet_protocol(skb);
98 if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
99 len = ntohs(ip_hdr(skb)->tot_len);
100 if (unlikely(len < sizeof(struct iphdr)))