s390/airq: silence lockdep warning
authorSebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:30:19 +0000 (14:30 +0200)
committerMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:48:30 +0000 (10:48 +0200)
airq_iv_(alloc|free) is called by some users with interrupts enabled
and by some with interrupts disabled which leads to the following
lockdep warning:

[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
3.14.0-15249-gbf29b7b-dirty #25 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------------------
insmod/2108 just changed the state of lock:
 (&(&iv->lock)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<000000000046ee3e>] airq_iv_alloc+0x62/0x228
but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-READ-safe lock in the past:
 (&info->lock){.-.-..}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&(&iv->lock)->rlock);
                               local_irq_disable();
                               lock(&info->lock);
                               lock(&(&iv->lock)->rlock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&info->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

Although this is a false alarm (since each airq user consistently
calls these functions from the same context) fix this by ensuring
that interrupts are disabled when the airq lock is held.

Reported-by: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
drivers/s390/cio/airq.c

index 445564c790f65ddc587d2a8185468c28b9e711a7..00bfbee0af9e0ebf54defb9759801337ec3dc8e7 100644 (file)
@@ -196,11 +196,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(airq_iv_release);
  */
 unsigned long airq_iv_alloc(struct airq_iv *iv, unsigned long num)
 {
-       unsigned long bit, i;
+       unsigned long bit, i, flags;
 
        if (!iv->avail || num == 0)
                return -1UL;
-       spin_lock(&iv->lock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&iv->lock, flags);
        bit = find_first_bit_inv(iv->avail, iv->bits);
        while (bit + num <= iv->bits) {
                for (i = 1; i < num; i++)
@@ -218,9 +218,8 @@ unsigned long airq_iv_alloc(struct airq_iv *iv, unsigned long num)
        }
        if (bit + num > iv->bits)
                bit = -1UL;
-       spin_unlock(&iv->lock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iv->lock, flags);
        return bit;
-
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(airq_iv_alloc);
 
@@ -232,11 +231,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(airq_iv_alloc);
  */
 void airq_iv_free(struct airq_iv *iv, unsigned long bit, unsigned long num)
 {
-       unsigned long i;
+       unsigned long i, flags;
 
        if (!iv->avail || num == 0)
                return;
-       spin_lock(&iv->lock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&iv->lock, flags);
        for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
                /* Clear (possibly left over) interrupt bit */
                clear_bit_inv(bit + i, iv->vector);
@@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ void airq_iv_free(struct airq_iv *iv, unsigned long bit, unsigned long num)
                while (iv->end > 0 && !test_bit_inv(iv->end - 1, iv->avail))
                        iv->end--;
        }
-       spin_unlock(&iv->lock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iv->lock, flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(airq_iv_free);