return sum;
}
+/*
+ * Consumers of these two interfaces, like for example the cpuidle menu
+ * governor, are using nonsensical data. Preferring shallow idle state selection
+ * for a CPU that has IO-wait which might not even end up running the task when
+ * it does become runnable.
+ */
+
+unsigned long nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ return atomic_read(&cpu_rq(cpu)->nr_iowait);
+}
+
+void get_iowait_load(unsigned long *nr_waiters, unsigned long *load)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = this_rq();
+ *nr_waiters = atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait);
+ *load = rq->load.weight;
+}
+
/*
* IO-wait accounting, and how its mostly bollocks (on SMP).
*
unsigned long i, sum = 0;
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
- sum += atomic_read(&cpu_rq(i)->nr_iowait);
+ sum += nr_iowait_cpu(i);
return sum;
}
-/*
- * Consumers of these two interfaces, like for example the cpuidle menu
- * governor, are using nonsensical data. Preferring shallow idle state selection
- * for a CPU that has IO-wait which might not even end up running the task when
- * it does become runnable.
- */
-
-unsigned long nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu)
-{
- struct rq *this = cpu_rq(cpu);
- return atomic_read(&this->nr_iowait);
-}
-
-void get_iowait_load(unsigned long *nr_waiters, unsigned long *load)
-{
- struct rq *rq = this_rq();
- *nr_waiters = atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait);
- *load = rq->load.weight;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*