Commit
3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events
properly") moved interrupt acknowledgment to the end of the interrupt
handler. In part this was done because the AST2500 datasheet says:
I2CD10 Interrupt Status Register
bit 2 Receive Done Interrupt status
S/W needs to clear this status bit to allow next data receiving.
Acknowledging Receive Done before receive data was handled resulted in
receive errors on high speed I2C busses.
However, interrupt acknowledgment was not only moved to the end of the
interrupt handler for Receive Done Interrupt status, but for all interrupt
status bits. This could result in race conditions if a second interrupt was
received during interrupt handling and not handled but still acknowledged
at the end of the interrupt handler.
Acknowledge only "Receive Done Interrupt status" late in the interrupt
handler to solve the problem.
Fixes: 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly")
Cc: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
spin_lock(&bus->lock);
irq_received = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG);
+ /* Ack all interrupts except for Rx done */
+ writel(irq_received & ~ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE,
+ bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG);
irq_remaining = irq_received;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
"irq handled != irq. expected 0x%08x, but was 0x%08x\n",
irq_received, irq_handled);
- /* Ack all interrupt bits. */
- writel(irq_received, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG);
+ /* Ack Rx done */
+ if (irq_received & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE)
+ writel(ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE,
+ bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_STS_REG);
spin_unlock(&bus->lock);
return irq_remaining ? IRQ_NONE : IRQ_HANDLED;
}