Change find_new_reaper() to use for_each_thread() instead of deprecated
while_each_thread(). We do not bother to check "thread != father" in the
1st loop, we can rely on PF_EXITING check.
Note: this means the minor behavioural change: for_each_thread() starts
from the group leader. But this should be fine, nobody should make any
assumption about do_wait(__WNOTHREAD) when it comes to reparented tasks.
And this can avoid the pointless reparenting to a short-living thread
While zombie leaders are not that common.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Cc: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Cc: Sterling Alexander <stalexan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(father);
struct task_struct *thread;
- thread = father;
- while_each_thread(father, thread) {
+ for_each_thread(father, thread) {
if (thread->flags & PF_EXITING)
continue;
if (unlikely(pid_ns->child_reaper == father))
break;
if (!reaper->signal->is_child_subreaper)
continue;
- thread = reaper;
- do {
+ for_each_thread(reaper, thread) {
if (!(thread->flags & PF_EXITING))
return thread;
- } while_each_thread(reaper, thread);
+ }
}
}