drm/i915/execlists: Clear user-active flag on preemption completion
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:58:29 +0000 (12:58 +0000)
committerJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:45:32 +0000 (16:45 +0300)
When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a
successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had
assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue
(preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may
be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have
completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set
even though the system is now idle.

We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests()
as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared.

Fixes: f6322eddaff7 ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: MichaƂ Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180324125829.27026-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit eed7ec52f214bac2f25395ccaad610fbeb842a6e)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c

index 697af5add78bac2668987809fdbd94bc08aa0dc7..e3a5f673ff673d2784bfc2bff7ca14c0a959578e 100644 (file)
@@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
                 * know the next preemption status we see corresponds
                 * to this ELSP update.
                 */
+               GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists,
+                                               EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER));
                GEM_BUG_ON(!port_count(&port[0]));
                if (port_count(&port[0]) > 1)
                        goto unlock;
@@ -738,6 +740,8 @@ execlists_cancel_port_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists)
                memset(port, 0, sizeof(*port));
                port++;
        }
+
+       execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER);
 }
 
 static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -1001,6 +1005,11 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
 
        if (fw)
                intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, execlists->fw_domains);
+
+       /* If the engine is now idle, so should be the flag; and vice versa. */
+       GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_is_active(&engine->execlists,
+                                      EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER) ==
+                  !port_isset(engine->execlists.port));
 }
 
 static void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,