btrfs: tests/qgroup: Fix wrong tree backref level

The extent tree of the test fs is like the following:

 BTRFS info (device (null)): leaf 16327509003777336587 total ptrs 1 free space 3919
  item 0 key (4096 168 4096) itemoff 3944 itemsize 51
          extent refs 1 gen 1 flags 2
          tree block key (68719476736 0 0) level 1
                                           ^^^^^^^
          ref#0: tree block backref root 5

And it's using an empty tree for fs tree, so there is no way that its
level can be 1.

For REAL (created by mkfs) fs tree backref with no skinny metadata, the
result should look like:

 item 3 key (30408704 EXTENT_ITEM 4096) itemoff 3845 itemsize 51
         refs 1 gen 4 flags TREE_BLOCK
         tree block key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) level 0
                                           ^^^^^^^
         tree block backref root 5

Fix the level to 0, so it won't break later tree level checker.

Fixes: faa2dbf004e8 ("Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting code")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
index 90204b166643524b9d7fa445a34a23e10ce178ef..160eb2fba72640c375d82154a94372c8a5722d1d 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int insert_normal_tree_ref(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr,
        btrfs_set_extent_generation(leaf, item, 1);
        btrfs_set_extent_flags(leaf, item, BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK);
        block_info = (struct btrfs_tree_block_info *)(item + 1);
-       btrfs_set_tree_block_level(leaf, block_info, 1);
+       btrfs_set_tree_block_level(leaf, block_info, 0);
        iref = (struct btrfs_extent_inline_ref *)(block_info + 1);
        if (parent > 0) {
                btrfs_set_extent_inline_ref_type(leaf, iref,