9p: fix spelling mistake in fall-through annotation

Replace "fallthough" with a proper "fall through" annotation.

This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180903193806.GA11258@embeddedor.com
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 402012 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@cea.fr>

diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
index 5f2e48d41d725b40ec02c3f72ffb735733d3eaa3..374bc1c720481ec3d0e5e2af2c8d661a9a0f8829 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_do_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
                break;
        default:
                WARN_ONCE(1, "unknown lock status code: %d\n", status);
-               /* fallthough */
+               /* fall through */
        case P9_LOCK_ERROR:
        case P9_LOCK_GRACE:
                res = -ENOLCK;