mtd: nftl: clean up indentation, remove extraneous tabs
authorColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Sun, 18 Nov 2018 16:36:56 +0000 (16:36 +0000)
committerBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Sun, 2 Dec 2018 08:20:36 +0000 (09:20 +0100)
The hunk of code is indented too much by one level, fix this by
removing the extraneous tabs. Also terminate block comment using
the recommended coding style to clean up checkpatch warning.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c

index 91b7fb326f9ab627697b1e8426cfcca4e314a838..334aa5b3a655eabbed9d7bae6503f01b6657db87 100644 (file)
@@ -346,25 +346,26 @@ int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)
                goto fail;
        }
 
-               /* increase and write Wear-Leveling info */
-               nb_erases = le32_to_cpu(uci.WearInfo);
-               nb_erases++;
-
-               /* wrap (almost impossible with current flash) or free block */
-               if (nb_erases == 0)
-                       nb_erases = 1;
-
-               /* check the "freeness" of Erase Unit before updating metadata
-                * FixMe:  is this check really necessary ? since we have check the
-                *         return code after the erase operation. */
-               if (check_free_sectors(nftl, instr->addr, nftl->EraseSize, 1) != 0)
-                       goto fail;
-
-               uci.WearInfo = le32_to_cpu(nb_erases);
-               if (nftl_write_oob(mtd, block * nftl->EraseSize + SECTORSIZE +
-                                  8, 8, &retlen, (char *)&uci) < 0)
-                       goto fail;
-               return 0;
+       /* increase and write Wear-Leveling info */
+       nb_erases = le32_to_cpu(uci.WearInfo);
+       nb_erases++;
+
+       /* wrap (almost impossible with current flash) or free block */
+       if (nb_erases == 0)
+               nb_erases = 1;
+
+       /* check the "freeness" of Erase Unit before updating metadata
+        * FixMe:  is this check really necessary ? since we have check the
+        *         return code after the erase operation.
+        */
+       if (check_free_sectors(nftl, instr->addr, nftl->EraseSize, 1) != 0)
+               goto fail;
+
+       uci.WearInfo = le32_to_cpu(nb_erases);
+       if (nftl_write_oob(mtd, block * nftl->EraseSize + SECTORSIZE +
+                          8, 8, &retlen, (char *)&uci) < 0)
+               goto fail;
+       return 0;
 fail:
        /* could not format, update the bad block table (caller is responsible
           for setting the ReplUnitTable to BLOCK_RESERVED on failure) */