In
293d5b439483 ("perf probe: Support probing on offline cross-arch binary")
DWARF register tables were introduced for many architectures, with the one for
the "dx" register being broken for x86_64, which got noticed by the 'perf test
bpf' testcase, that has this difference from a successful run to one that
fails, with the aforementioned patch:
-Writing event: p:perf_bpf_probe/func _text+
5197232 f_mode=+68(%di):x32 offset=%si:s64 orig=dx:s32
-Failed to write event: Invalid argument
-bpf_probe: failed to apply perf probe eventsFailed to add events selected by BPF
+Writing event: p:perf_bpf_probe/func _text+
5197232 f_mode=+68(%di):x32 offset=%si:s64 orig=%dx:s32
Add the missing '%' to '%dx' to fix this.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Fixes: 293d5b439483 ("perf probe: Support probing on offline cross-arch binary")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160909145955.GC32585@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
};
static const char * const x86_64_regstr_tbl[] = {
- "%ax", "dx", "%cx", "%bx", "%si", "%di",
+ "%ax", "%dx", "%cx", "%bx", "%si", "%di",
"%bp", "%sp", "%r8", "%r9", "%r10", "%r11",
"%r12", "%r13", "%r14", "%r15",
};