The special property of return values for helpers bpf_get_stack
and bpf_probe_read_str are captured in verifier.
Both helpers return a negative error code or
a length, which is equal to or smaller than the buffer
size argument. This additional information in the
verifier can avoid the condition such as "retval > bufsize"
in the bpf program. For example, for the code blow,
usize = bpf_get_stack(ctx, raw_data, max_len, BPF_F_USER_STACK);
if (usize < 0 || usize > max_len)
return 0;
The verifier may have the following errors:
52: (85) call bpf_get_stack#65
R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0) R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0) R3_w=inv800 R4_w=inv256
R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0)
R9_w=inv800 R10=fp0,call_-1
53: (bf) r8 = r0
54: (bf) r1 = r8
55: (67) r1 <<= 32
56: (bf) r2 = r1
57: (77) r2 >>= 32
58: (25) if r2 > 0x31f goto pc+33
R0=inv(id=0) R1=inv(id=0,smax_value=
9223372032559808512,
umax_value=
18446744069414584320,
var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000))
R2=inv(id=0,umax_value=799,var_off=(0x0; 0x3ff))
R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0)
R8=inv(id=0) R9=inv800 R10=fp0,call_-1
59: (1f) r9 -= r8
60: (c7) r1 s>>= 32
61: (bf) r2 = r7
62: (0f) r2 += r1
math between map_value pointer and register with unbounded
min value is not allowed
The failure is due to llvm compiler optimization where register "r2",
which is a copy of "r1", is tested for condition while later on "r1"
is used for map_ptr operation. The verifier is not able to track such
inst sequence effectively.
Without the "usize > max_len" condition, there is no llvm optimization
and the below generated code passed verifier:
52: (85) call bpf_get_stack#65
R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0) R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0) R3_w=inv800 R4_w=inv256
R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0)
R9_w=inv800 R10=fp0,call_-1
53: (b7) r1 = 0
54: (bf) r8 = r0
55: (67) r8 <<= 32
56: (c7) r8 s>>= 32
57: (6d) if r1 s> r8 goto pc+24
R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=800,var_off=(0x0; 0x3ff))
R1=inv0 R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
R7=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0)
R8=inv(id=0,umax_value=800,var_off=(0x0; 0x3ff)) R9=inv800
R10=fp0,call_-1
58: (bf) r2 = r7
59: (0f) r2 += r8
60: (1f) r9 -= r8
61: (bf) r1 = r6
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bool pkt_access;
int regno;
int access_size;
+ s64 msize_smax_value;
+ u64 msize_umax_value;
};
static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_verifier_lock);
} else if (arg_type_is_mem_size(arg_type)) {
bool zero_size_allowed = (arg_type == ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO);
+ /* remember the mem_size which may be used later
+ * to refine return values.
+ */
+ meta->msize_smax_value = reg->smax_value;
+ meta->msize_umax_value = reg->umax_value;
+
/* The register is SCALAR_VALUE; the access check
* happens using its boundaries.
*/
return 0;
}
+static void do_refine_retval_range(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, int ret_type,
+ int func_id,
+ struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *ret_reg = ®s[BPF_REG_0];
+
+ if (ret_type != RET_INTEGER ||
+ (func_id != BPF_FUNC_get_stack &&
+ func_id != BPF_FUNC_probe_read_str))
+ return;
+
+ ret_reg->smax_value = meta->msize_smax_value;
+ ret_reg->umax_value = meta->msize_umax_value;
+ __reg_deduce_bounds(ret_reg);
+ __reg_bound_offset(ret_reg);
+}
+
static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
{
const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL;
return -EINVAL;
}
+ do_refine_retval_range(regs, fn->ret_type, func_id, &meta);
+
err = check_map_func_compatibility(env, meta.map_ptr, func_id);
if (err)
return err;