We plan to expose performance counters through 2 driver specific
ioctls until there's a solution to expose them in a generic way.
In order to be able to deprecate those ioctls when this new
infrastructure is in place we add an unsafe module parameter that
will keep those ioctls hidden unless it's set to true (which also
has the effect of tainting the kernel).
All unstable ioctl handlers should use panfrost_unstable_ioctl_check()
to check whether they're supposed to handle the request or reject it
with ENOSYS.
Suggested-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190618081648.17297-3-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
return !panfrost_model_cmp(pfdev, id);
}
+int panfrost_unstable_ioctl_check(void);
+
int panfrost_device_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev);
void panfrost_device_fini(struct panfrost_device *pfdev);
#include "panfrost_job.h"
#include "panfrost_gpu.h"
+static bool unstable_ioctls;
+module_param_unsafe(unstable_ioctls, bool, 0600);
+
static int panfrost_ioctl_get_param(struct drm_device *ddev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
{
struct drm_panfrost_get_param *param = data;
return 0;
}
+int panfrost_unstable_ioctl_check(void)
+{
+ if (!unstable_ioctls)
+ return -ENOSYS;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
panfrost_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
{