* remain unchanged after such an expiration, and the
* following statement therefore assigns to
* entity->budget the remaining budget on such an
- * expiration. For clarity, entity->service is not
- * updated on expiration in any case, and, in normal
- * operation, is reset only when bfqq is selected for
- * service (see bfq_get_next_queue).
+ * expiration.
*/
entity->budget = min_t(unsigned long,
bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq),
bfqq->max_budget);
+ /*
+ * At this point, we have used entity->service to get
+ * the budget left (needed for updating
+ * entity->budget). Thus we finally can, and have to,
+ * reset entity->service. The latter must be reset
+ * because bfqq would otherwise be charged again for
+ * the service it has received during its previous
+ * service slot(s).
+ */
+ entity->service = 0;
+
return true;
}
+ /*
+ * We can finally complete expiration, by setting service to 0.
+ */
+ entity->service = 0;
entity->budget = max_t(unsigned long, bfqq->max_budget,
bfq_serv_to_charge(bfqq->next_rq, bfqq));
bfq_clear_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq(bfqq);
ref = bfqq->ref;
__bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd, bfqq);
+ if (ref == 1) /* bfqq is gone, no more actions on it */
+ return;
+
/* mark bfqq as waiting a request only if a bic still points to it */
- if (ref > 1 && !bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq) &&
+ if (!bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq) &&
reason != BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT &&
- reason != BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED)
+ reason != BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED) {
bfq_mark_bfqq_non_blocking_wait_rq(bfqq);
+ /*
+ * Not setting service to 0, because, if the next rq
+ * arrives in time, the queue will go on receiving
+ * service with this same budget (as if it never expired)
+ */
+ } else
+ entity->service = 0;
}
/*