This code isn't broken per se, but it's scary to look at! It looks like
in the t_data_nents==1 case we're doing both a kunmap and a vunmap,
what's saving us is that t_data_vmap in this case is 0, so vunmap
doesn't do anything.
Return after kunmap, so the handling of the three cases does not overlap.
Signed-off-by: Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
void transport_kunmap_data_sg(struct se_cmd *cmd)
{
- if (!cmd->t_data_nents)
+ if (!cmd->t_data_nents) {
return;
- else if (cmd->t_data_nents == 1)
+ } else if (cmd->t_data_nents == 1) {
kunmap(sg_page(cmd->t_data_sg));
+ return;
+ }
vunmap(cmd->t_data_vmap);
cmd->t_data_vmap = NULL;