mmc: card: fixing an false identification of SANITIZE command

Inside the routine mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd() the sanitize command is
identified according to the value of bits 16-23 of the argument.

but what happens if a different command is sent, and only by
chance, bits 16-23 contain the value of SANITIZE command ?
In that case a SANITIZE command will be falsely identified.
In order to prevent such a case, the condition is expanded and
now it also checks the opcode itself, and verifies that it is an
MMC_SWITCH opcode.

Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 59a13fce774e5eb29e30db496c862dc958f9c063..5411bf447369a9cd583c8356c590f588e0bf51ca 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -542,7 +542,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
                        goto cmd_rel_host;
        }
 
-       if (MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) {
+       if ((MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) &&
+           (cmd.opcode == MMC_SWITCH)) {
                err = ioctl_do_sanitize(card);
 
                if (err)