Btrfs: fix file read corruption after extent cloning and fsync

If we partially clone one extent of a file into a lower offset of the
file, fsync the file, power fail and then mount the fs to trigger log
replay, we can get multiple checksum items in the csum tree that overlap
each other and result in checksum lookup failures later. Those failures
can make file data read requests assume a checksum value of 0, but they
will not return an error (-EIO for example) to userspace exactly because
the expected checksum value 0 is a special value that makes the read bio
endio callback return success and set all the bytes of the corresponding
page with the value 0x01 (at fs/btrfs/inode.c:__readpage_endio_check()).
From a userspace perspective this is equivalent to file corruption
because we are not returning what was written to the file.

Details about how this can happen, and why, are included inline in the
following reproducer test case for fstests and the comment added to
tree-log.c.

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"
  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      _cleanup_flakey
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter
  . ./common/dmflakey

  # real QA test starts here
  _need_to_be_root
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _require_dm_flakey
  _require_cloner
  _require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV

  rm -f $seqres.full

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _init_flakey
  _mount_flakey

  # Create our test file with a single 100K extent starting at file
  # offset 800K. We fsync the file here to make the fsync log tree gets
  # a single csum item that covers the whole 100K extent, which causes
  # the second fsync, done after the cloning operation below, to not
  # leave in the log tree two csum items covering two sub-ranges
  # ([0, 20K[ and [20K, 100K[)) of our extent.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 800K 100K"  \
                  -c "fsync"                     \
                   $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io

  # Now clone part of our extent into file offset 400K. This adds a file
  # extent item to our inode's metadata that points to the 100K extent
  # we created before, using a data offset of 20K and a data length of
  # 20K, so that it refers to the sub-range [20K, 40K[ of our original
  # extent.
  $CLONER_PROG -s $((800 * 1024 + 20 * 1024)) -d $((400 * 1024)) \
      -l $((20 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  # Now fsync our file to make sure the extent cloning is durably
  # persisted. This fsync will not add a second csum item to the log
  # tree containing the checksums for the blocks in the sub-range
  # [20K, 40K[ of our extent, because there was already a csum item in
  # the log tree covering the whole extent, added by the first fsync
  # we did before.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  echo "File digest before power failure:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch

  # Silently drop all writes and ummount to simulate a crash/power
  # failure.
  _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_DROP_WRITES
  _unmount_flakey

  # Allow writes again, mount to trigger log replay and validate file
  # contents.
  # The fsync log replay first processes the file extent item
  # corresponding to the file offset 400K (the one which refers to the
  # [20K, 40K[ sub-range of our 100K extent) and then processes the file
  # extent item for file offset 800K. It used to happen that when
  # processing the later, it erroneously left in the csum tree 2 csum
  # items that overlapped each other, 1 for the sub-range [20K, 40K[ and
  # 1 for the whole range of our extent. This introduced a problem where
  # subsequent lookups for the checksums of blocks within the range
  # [40K, 100K[ of our extent would not find anything because lookups in
  # the csum tree ended up looking only at the smaller csum item, the
  # one covering the subrange [20K, 40K[. This made read requests assume
  # an expected checksum with a value of 0 for those blocks, which caused
  # checksum verification failure when the read operations finished.
  # However those checksum failure did not result in read requests
  # returning an error to user space (like -EIO for e.g.) because the
  # expected checksum value had the special value 0, and in that case
  # btrfs set all bytes of the corresponding pages with the value 0x01
  # and produce the following warning in dmesg/syslog:
  #
  #  "BTRFS warning (device dm-0): csum failed ino 257 off 917504 csum\
  #   1322675045 expected csum 0"
  #
  _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES
  _mount_flakey

  echo "File digest after log replay:"
  # Must match the same digest he had after cloning the extent and
  # before the power failure happened.
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch

  _unmount_flakey

  status=0
  exit

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 6d650468d21acd7e62f3746453abefde5166361e..1bbaace733838e6fc70dba1babafb6f9265c00f9 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -722,11 +722,65 @@ static noinline int replay_one_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                                                &ordered_sums, 0);
                        if (ret)
                                goto out;
+                       /*
+                        * Now delete all existing cums in the csum root that
+                        * cover our range. We do this because we can have an
+                        * extent that is completely referenced by one file
+                        * extent item and partially referenced by another
+                        * file extent item (like after using the clone or
+                        * extent_same ioctls). In this case if we end up doing
+                        * the replay of the one that partially references the
+                        * extent first, and we do not do the csum deletion
+                        * below, we can get 2 csum items in the csum tree that
+                        * overlap each other. For example, imagine our log has
+                        * the two following file extent items:
+                        *
+                        * key (257 EXTENT_DATA 409600)
+                        *     extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 102400
+                        *     extent data offset 20480 nr 20480 ram 102400
+                        *
+                        * key (257 EXTENT_DATA 819200)
+                        *     extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 102400
+                        *     extent data offset 0 nr 102400 ram 102400
+                        *
+                        * Where the second one fully references the 100K extent
+                        * that starts at disk byte 12845056, and the log tree
+                        * has a single csum item that covers the entire range
+                        * of the extent:
+                        *
+                        * key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 12845056) itemsize 100
+                        *
+                        * After the first file extent item is replayed, the
+                        * csum tree gets the following csum item:
+                        *
+                        * key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 12865536) itemsize 20
+                        *
+                        * Which covers the 20K sub-range starting at offset 20K
+                        * of our extent. Now when we replay the second file
+                        * extent item, if we do not delete existing csum items
+                        * that cover any of its blocks, we end up getting two
+                        * csum items in our csum tree that overlap each other:
+                        *
+                        * key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 12845056) itemsize 100
+                        * key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 12865536) itemsize 20
+                        *
+                        * Which is a problem, because after this anyone trying
+                        * to lookup up for the checksum of any block of our
+                        * extent starting at an offset of 40K or higher, will
+                        * end up looking at the second csum item only, which
+                        * does not contain the checksum for any block starting
+                        * at offset 40K or higher of our extent.
+                        */
                        while (!list_empty(&ordered_sums)) {
                                struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
                                sums = list_entry(ordered_sums.next,
                                                struct btrfs_ordered_sum,
                                                list);
+                               if (!ret)
+                                       ret = btrfs_del_csums(trans,
+                                                     root->fs_info->csum_root,
+                                                     sums->bytenr,
+                                                     sums->len);
                                if (!ret)
                                        ret = btrfs_csum_file_blocks(trans,
                                                root->fs_info->csum_root,