s390/bpf: fix lcgr instruction encoding
authorIlya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:03:32 +0000 (17:03 +0200)
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:03:35 +0000 (18:03 +0200)
"masking, test in bounds 3" fails on s390, because
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0) ignores the top 32 bits of
BPF_REG_2. The reason is that JIT emits lcgfr instead of lcgr.
The associated comment indicates that the code was intended to
emit lcgr in the first place, it's just that the wrong opcode
was used.

Fix by using the correct opcode.

Fixes: 054623105728 ("s390/bpf: Add s390x eBPF JIT compiler backend")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

index e636728ab452e1818f3566727396945264f3af3b..6299156f973832e6a6904b4b0f09b72f4629e215 100644 (file)
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
                break;
        case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG: /* dst = -dst */
                /* lcgr %dst,%dst */
-               EMIT4(0xb9130000, dst_reg, dst_reg);
+               EMIT4(0xb9030000, dst_reg, dst_reg);
                break;
        /*
         * BPF_FROM_BE/LE