wl->num_rx_desc was mistakenly initialized with WL18XX_NUM_TX_DESCRIPTORS
but it should use WL18XX_NUM_RX_DESCRIPTORS instead.
This bug was passed unnoticed because currently both RX and TX descriptors
are initialized to the same value (32).
Signed-off-by: Yair Shapira <yair.shapira@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
wl->rtable = wl18xx_rtable;
wl->num_tx_desc = WL18XX_NUM_TX_DESCRIPTORS;
- wl->num_rx_desc = WL18XX_NUM_TX_DESCRIPTORS;
+ wl->num_rx_desc = WL18XX_NUM_RX_DESCRIPTORS;
wl->num_channels = 2;
wl->num_mac_addr = WL18XX_NUM_MAC_ADDRESSES;
wl->band_rate_to_idx = wl18xx_band_rate_to_idx;