Currently the return type of the bpf_prog_array_alloc() is
struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *, which is not quite correct.
Obviously, the returned pointer is a generic pointer, which
is valid for an indefinite amount of time and it's not shared
with anyone else, so there is no sense in marking it as __rcu.
This change eliminate the following sparse warnings:
kernel/bpf/core.c:1544:31: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1544:31: expected struct bpf_prog_array [noderef] <asn:4>*
kernel/bpf/core.c:1544:31: got void *
kernel/bpf/core.c:1548:17: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1548:17: expected struct bpf_prog_array [noderef] <asn:4>*
kernel/bpf/core.c:1548:17: got struct bpf_prog_array *<noident>
kernel/bpf/core.c:1681:15: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
kernel/bpf/core.c:1681:15: expected struct bpf_prog_array *array
kernel/bpf/core.c:1681:15: got struct bpf_prog_array [noderef] <asn:4>*
Fixes: 324bda9e6c5a ("bpf: multi program support for cgroup+bpf")
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
struct bpf_prog *progs[0];
};
-struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags);
+struct bpf_prog_array *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags);
void bpf_prog_array_free(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *progs);
int bpf_prog_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *progs);
int bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *progs,
.null_prog = NULL,
};
-struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags)
+struct bpf_prog_array *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags)
{
if (prog_cnt)
return kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_prog_array) +