track_pfn_insert() overwrites the pgprot that is passed in with a value
based on the VMA's page_prot. This is a problem for people trying to
do clever things with the new vm_insert_pfn_prot() as it will simply
overwrite the passed protection flags. If we use the current value of
the pgprot as the base, then it will behave as people are expecting.
Also fix track_pfn_remap() in the same way.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453742717-10326-2-git-send-email-matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
return -EINVAL;
}
- *prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) |
+ *prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(*prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) |
cachemode2protval(pcm));
return 0;
/* Set prot based on lookup */
pcm = lookup_memtype(pfn_t_to_phys(pfn));
- *prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) |
+ *prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(*prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) |
cachemode2protval(pcm));
return 0;