Commit
78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one") moved the vq
lock to improve scalability, but introduced a possible deadlock in
vhost-iotlb. vhost_iotlb_notify_vq() now takes vq->mutex while holding
the device's IOTLB spinlock. And on the vhost_iotlb_miss() path, the
spinlock is taken while holding vq->mutex.
Since calling vhost_poll_queue() doesn't require any lock, avoid the
deadlock by not taking vq->mutex.
Fixes: 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one")
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
if (msg->iova <= vq_msg->iova &&
msg->iova + msg->size - 1 >= vq_msg->iova &&
vq_msg->type == VHOST_IOTLB_MISS) {
- mutex_lock(&node->vq->mutex);
vhost_poll_queue(&node->vq->poll);
- mutex_unlock(&node->vq->mutex);
-
list_del(&node->node);
kfree(node);
}