NFS: Fix another OPEN_DOWNGRADE bug
authorTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Sat, 25 Jun 2016 23:19:28 +0000 (19:19 -0400)
committerAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:55:34 +0000 (16:55 -0400)
Olga Kornievskaia reports that the following test fails to trigger
an OPEN_DOWNGRADE on the wire, and only triggers the final CLOSE.

fd0 = open(foo, RDRW)   -- should be open on the wire for "both"
fd1 = open(foo, RDONLY)  -- should be open on the wire for "read"
close(fd0) -- should trigger an open_downgrade
read(fd1)
close(fd1)

The issue is that we're missing a check for whether or not the current
state transitioned from an O_RDWR state as opposed to having transitioned
from a combination of O_RDONLY and O_WRONLY.

Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
Fixes: cd9288ffaea4 ("NFSv4: Fix another bug in the close/open_downgrade code")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c

index 406dd3eb68e21245402a1638d6ad6e18766b365c..ff416d0e24bc25215a991c282e8ae19a65d31832 100644 (file)
@@ -2882,12 +2882,11 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
                        call_close |= is_wronly;
                else if (is_wronly)
                        calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
+               if (calldata->arg.fmode != (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))
+                       call_close |= is_rdwr;
        } else if (is_rdwr)
                calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
 
-       if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0)
-               call_close |= is_rdwr;
-
        if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state))
                call_close = 0;
        spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);