Btrfs: remove unused check of skip_locking
authorLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Tue, 29 May 2018 13:27:06 +0000 (21:27 +0800)
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Wed, 30 May 2018 14:46:52 +0000 (16:46 +0200)
The check is superfluous since all callers who set search_for_commit
also have skip_locking set.

ASSERT() is put in place to ensure skip_locking is set by new callers.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
fs/btrfs/ctree.c

index 973912ec899281e87de68e5c9301aa56a236ac99..4bc326df472ef4c81af658cb08ea77bae20c2916 100644 (file)
@@ -2619,8 +2619,11 @@ static struct extent_buffer *btrfs_search_slot_get_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
                level = btrfs_header_level(b);
                if (p->need_commit_sem)
                        up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
-               if (!p->skip_locking)
-                       btrfs_tree_read_lock(b);
+               /*
+                * Ensure that all callers have set skip_locking when
+                * p->search_commit_root = 1.
+                */
+               ASSERT(p->skip_locking == 1);
 
                goto out;
        }