From: Ben Widawsky Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 05:59:48 +0000 (-0700) Subject: drm/i915: use cpu_relax() in wait_for_atomic X-Git-Url: http://git.cdn.openwrt.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0cc2764cc4a4bd73df55f8893c871778cf7ddd0f;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git drm/i915: use cpu_relax() in wait_for_atomic As part of the advice given to us from the hardware designers regarding the maximum wait time on the forcewake handshake we need to move from us granularity to ms granularity. In earlier patches to do this, Jani noticed that wait_for_us was properly converted to use cpu_relax(), but wait_for was not. The issue has existed since the introduction of the macro: commit 913d8d110078788c14812dce8bb62c37946821d2 Author: Chris Wilson Date: Sat Aug 7 11:01:35 2010 +0100 drm/i915: Ensure that while(INREG()) are bounded (v2) CC: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index ee0beb4833fb..3f7eefc5d976 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -41,7 +41,11 @@ ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT; \ break; \ } \ - if (W && drm_can_sleep()) msleep(W); \ + if (W && drm_can_sleep()) { \ + msleep(W); \ + } else { \ + cpu_relax(); \ + } \ } \ ret__; \ })