From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:56:32 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: perf annotate: Fix objdump comment parsing for Intel mov dissassembly
X-Git-Url: http://git.cdn.openwrt.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=35a8a148d8c1ee9e5ae18f9565a880490f816f89;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git

perf annotate: Fix objdump comment parsing for Intel mov dissassembly

The command 'perf annotate' parses the output of objdump and also
investigates the comments produced by objdump. For example the
output of objdump produces (on x86):

23eee:  4c 8b 3d 13 01 21 00 mov 0x210113(%rip),%r15
                                # 234008 <stderr@@GLIBC_2.2.5+0x9a8>

and the function mov__parse() is called to investigate the complete
line. Mov__parse() breaks this line into several parts and finally
calls function comment__symbol() to parse the data after the comment
character '#'. Comment__symbol() expects a hexadecimal address followed
by a symbol in '<' and '>' brackets.

However the 2nd parameter given to function comment__symbol()
always points to the comment character '#'. The address parsing
always returns 0 because the character '#' is not a digit and
strtoull() fails without being noticed.

Fix this by advancing the second parameter to function comment__symbol()
by one byte before invocation and add an error check after strtoull()
has been called.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Fixes: 6de783b6f50f ("perf annotate: Resolve symbols using objdump comment")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128075632.72182-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 22ea7936d92f..facad1e279a8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -322,6 +322,8 @@ static int comment__symbol(char *raw, char *comment, u64 *addrp, char **namep)
 		return 0;
 
 	*addrp = strtoull(comment, &endptr, 16);
+	if (endptr == comment)
+		return 0;
 	name = strchr(endptr, '<');
 	if (name == NULL)
 		return -1;
@@ -435,8 +437,8 @@ static int mov__parse(struct arch *arch, struct ins_operands *ops, struct map *m
 		return 0;
 
 	comment = ltrim(comment);
-	comment__symbol(ops->source.raw, comment, &ops->source.addr, &ops->source.name);
-	comment__symbol(ops->target.raw, comment, &ops->target.addr, &ops->target.name);
+	comment__symbol(ops->source.raw, comment + 1, &ops->source.addr, &ops->source.name);
+	comment__symbol(ops->target.raw, comment + 1, &ops->target.addr, &ops->target.name);
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -480,7 +482,7 @@ static int dec__parse(struct arch *arch __maybe_unused, struct ins_operands *ops
 		return 0;
 
 	comment = ltrim(comment);
-	comment__symbol(ops->target.raw, comment, &ops->target.addr, &ops->target.name);
+	comment__symbol(ops->target.raw, comment + 1, &ops->target.addr, &ops->target.name);
 
 	return 0;
 }