From: Daisuke Nishimura Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:37:41 +0000 (+0900) Subject: sched: Fix cgroup movement of waking process X-Git-Url: http://git.cdn.openwrt.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=62af3783e4fd8ba9e28416e8e91cb3bdd9fb133e;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git sched: Fix cgroup movement of waking process There is a small race between try_to_wake_up() and sched_move_task(), which is trying to move the process being woken up. try_to_wake_up() on CPU0 sched_move_task() on CPU1 --------------------------------+--------------------------------- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(p->pi_lock) task_waking_fair() ->p.se.vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime ttwu_queue() ->send reschedule IPI to CPU1 raw_spin_unlock_irqsave(p->pi_lock) task_rq_lock() -> tring to aquire both p->pi_lock and rq->lock with IRQ disabled task_move_group_fair() -> p.se.vruntime -= (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime += (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime task_rq_unlock() (via IPI) sched_ttwu_pending() raw_spin_lock(rq->lock) ttwu_do_activate() ... enqueue_entity() child.se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock) As a result, vruntime of the process becomes far bigger than min_vruntime, if (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime >> (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime. This patch fixes this problem by just ignoring such process in task_move_group_fair(), because the vruntime has already been normalized in task_waking_fair(). Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tejun Heo Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111215143741.df82dd50.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 2d1ac6e2386d..bdf18836f74e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5344,11 +5344,13 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq) * * - Moving a forked child which is waiting for being woken up by * wake_up_new_task(). + * - Moving a task which has been woken up by try_to_wake_up() and + * waiting for actually being woken up by sched_ttwu_pending(). * * To prevent boost or penalty in the new cfs_rq caused by delta * min_vruntime between the two cfs_rqs, we skip vruntime adjustment. */ - if (!on_rq && !p->se.sum_exec_runtime) + if (!on_rq && (!p->se.sum_exec_runtime || p->state == TASK_WAKING)) on_rq = 1; if (!on_rq)