From: Matan Barak Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 06:43:48 +0000 (+0300) Subject: {net,IB}/mlx5: Add has_tag to mlx5_flow_act X-Git-Url: http://git.cdn.openwrt.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a9db0ecf1578894ea3405f3eb5a441508840d479;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git {net,IB}/mlx5: Add has_tag to mlx5_flow_act The has_tag member will indicate whether a tag action was specified in flow specification. A flow tag 0 = MLX5_FS_DEFAULT_FLOW_TAG is assumed a valid flow tag that is currently used by mlx5 RDMA driver, whereas in HW flow_tag = 0 means that the user doesn't care about flow_tag. HW always provide a flow_tag = 0 if all flow tags requested on a specific flow are 0. So we need a way (in the driver) to differentiate between a user really requesting flow_tag = 0 and a user who does not care, in order to be able to report conflicting flow tags on a specific flow. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak Reviewed-by: Aviad Yehezkel Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed --- diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c index 1b305367a817..d50ace805995 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c @@ -2535,6 +2535,7 @@ static int parse_flow_attr(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, u32 *match_c, return -EINVAL; action->flow_tag = ib_spec->flow_tag.tag_id; + action->has_flow_tag = true; break; case IB_FLOW_SPEC_ACTION_DROP: if (FIELDS_NOT_SUPPORTED(ib_spec->drop, @@ -2847,7 +2848,7 @@ static struct mlx5_ib_flow_handler *_create_flow_rule(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_NEXT_PRIO; } - if (flow_act.flow_tag != MLX5_FS_DEFAULT_FLOW_TAG && + if (flow_act.has_flow_tag && (flow_attr->type == IB_FLOW_ATTR_ALL_DEFAULT || flow_attr->type == IB_FLOW_ATTR_MC_DEFAULT)) { mlx5_ib_warn(dev, "Flow tag %u and attribute type %x isn't allowed in leftovers\n", diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c index fd98b0dc610f..eeff1fac77ef 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c @@ -675,6 +675,7 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_nic_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5_flow_destination dest[2] = {}; struct mlx5_flow_act flow_act = { .action = attr->action, + .has_flow_tag = true, .flow_tag = attr->flow_tag, .encap_id = 0, }; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c index c025c98700e4..d81da6920be8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c @@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ static int check_conflicting_ftes(struct fs_fte *fte, const struct mlx5_flow_act return -EEXIST; } - if (fte->flow_tag != flow_act->flow_tag) { + if (flow_act->has_flow_tag && fte->flow_tag != flow_act->flow_tag) { mlx5_core_warn(get_dev(&fte->node), "FTE flow tag %u already exists with different flow tag %u\n", fte->flow_tag, diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/fs.h b/include/linux/mlx5/fs.h index a0b48afcb422..f580bc4c2443 100644 --- a/include/linux/mlx5/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/fs.h @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ void mlx5_destroy_flow_group(struct mlx5_flow_group *fg); struct mlx5_flow_act { u32 action; + bool has_flow_tag; u32 flow_tag; u32 encap_id; u32 modify_id;