From: H. Peter Anvin Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:26:31 +0000 (-0800) Subject: x86, 386 removal: Remove support for IRQ 13 FPU error reporting X-Git-Url: http://git.cdn.openwrt.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bc3eba60682750dd7b45ea616d65c926fc3b8be8;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git x86, 386 removal: Remove support for IRQ 13 FPU error reporting Remove support for FPU error reporting via IRQ 13, as opposed to exception 16 (#MF). One last remnant of i386 gone. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Alan Cox --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c index fbd895562292..3286a92e662a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c @@ -26,11 +26,6 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { - /* - * We use exception 16 if we have hardware math and we've either seen - * it or the CPU claims it is internal - */ - int fpu_exception = c->hard_math && (ignore_fpu_irq || cpu_has_fpu); seq_printf(m, "fdiv_bug\t: %s\n" "hlt_bug\t\t: %s\n" @@ -45,7 +40,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) c->f00f_bug ? "yes" : "no", c->coma_bug ? "yes" : "no", c->hard_math ? "yes" : "no", - fpu_exception ? "yes" : "no", + c->hard_math ? "yes" : "no", c->cpuid_level, c->wp_works_ok ? "yes" : "no"); } diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c index 6e03b0d69138..7dc4e459c2b3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c @@ -42,39 +42,6 @@ * (these are usually mapped into the 0x30-0xff vector range) */ -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 -/* - * Note that on a 486, we don't want to do a SIGFPE on an irq13 - * as the irq is unreliable, and exception 16 works correctly - * (ie as explained in the intel literature). On a 386, you - * can't use exception 16 due to bad IBM design, so we have to - * rely on the less exact irq13. - * - * Careful.. Not only is IRQ13 unreliable, but it is also - * leads to races. IBM designers who came up with it should - * be shot. - */ - -static irqreturn_t math_error_irq(int cpl, void *dev_id) -{ - outb(0, 0xF0); - if (ignore_fpu_irq || !boot_cpu_data.hard_math) - return IRQ_NONE; - math_error(get_irq_regs(), 0, X86_TRAP_MF); - return IRQ_HANDLED; -} - -/* - * New motherboards sometimes make IRQ 13 be a PCI interrupt, - * so allow interrupt sharing. - */ -static struct irqaction fpu_irq = { - .handler = math_error_irq, - .name = "fpu", - .flags = IRQF_NO_THREAD, -}; -#endif - /* * IRQ2 is cascade interrupt to second interrupt controller */ @@ -242,13 +209,6 @@ void __init native_init_IRQ(void) setup_irq(2, &irq2); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 - /* - * External FPU? Set up irq13 if so, for - * original braindamaged IBM FERR coupling. - */ - if (boot_cpu_data.hard_math && !cpu_has_fpu) - setup_irq(FPU_IRQ, &fpu_irq); - irq_ctx_init(smp_processor_id()); #endif } diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c index 8276dc6794cc..4e1478c12344 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c @@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ asmlinkage int system_call(void); -/* Do we ignore FPU interrupts ? */ -char ignore_fpu_irq; - /* * The IDT has to be page-aligned to simplify the Pentium * F0 0F bug workaround. @@ -564,9 +561,6 @@ void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr) dotraplinkage void do_coprocessor_error(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) { -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 - ignore_fpu_irq = 1; -#endif exception_enter(regs); math_error(regs, error_code, X86_TRAP_MF); exception_exit(regs);