From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:52:08 +0000 (-0700) Subject: binfmt_misc: work around gcc-4.9 warning X-Git-Url: http://git.cdn.openwrt.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=de8288b1f87146da06f6912028a1a9615a75c987;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git binfmt_misc: work around gcc-4.9 warning gcc-4.9 on ARM gives us a mysterious warning about the binfmt_misc parse_command function: fs/binfmt_misc.c: In function 'parse_command.part.3': fs/binfmt_misc.c:405:7: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] I've managed to trace this back to the ARM implementation of memset, which is called from copy_from_user in case of a fault and which does #define memset(p,v,n) \ ({ \ void *__p = (p); size_t __n = n; \ if ((__n) != 0) { \ if (__builtin_constant_p((v)) && (v) == 0) \ __memzero((__p),(__n)); \ else \ memset((__p),(v),(__n)); \ } \ (__p); \ }) Apparently gcc gets confused by the check for "size != 0" and believes that the size might be zero when it gets to the line that does "if (s[count-1] == '\n')", so it would access data outside of the array. gcc is clearly wrong here, since this condition was already checked earlier in the function and the 'size' value can not change in the meantime. Fortunately, we can work around it and get rid of the warning by rearranging the function to check for zero size after doing the copy_from_user. It is still safe to pass a zero size into copy_from_user, so it does not cause any side effects. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/fs/binfmt_misc.c b/fs/binfmt_misc.c index c96b855d2a5e..fd8beb9657a2 100644 --- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c +++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c @@ -411,12 +411,12 @@ static int parse_command(const char __user *buffer, size_t count) { char s[4]; - if (!count) - return 0; if (count > 3) return -EINVAL; if (copy_from_user(s, buffer, count)) return -EFAULT; + if (!count) + return 0; if (s[count-1] == '\n') count--; if (count == 1 && s[0] == '0')