From 0f71b7b40f55de909e40fa5ab217a5da3439c7d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Becker Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:56:25 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: Fix endian bug in o2dlm protocol negotiation. struct dlm_query_join_packet is made up of four one-byte fields. They are effectively in big-endian order already. However, little-endian machines swap them before putting the packet on the wire (because query_join's response is a status, and that status is treated as a u32 on the wire). Thus, a big-endian and little-endian machines will treat this structure differently. The solution is to have little-endian machines swap the structure when converting from the structure to the u32 representation. Signed-off-by: Joel Becker Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 20 ++++---- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h index 9843ee17ea27..1f939631ab74 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h @@ -602,17 +602,19 @@ enum dlm_query_join_response_code { JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH, }; +struct dlm_query_join_packet { + u8 code; /* Response code. dlm_minor and fs_minor + are only valid if this is JOIN_OK */ + u8 dlm_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the + dlm is speaking. */ + u8 fs_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the + filesystem is speaking. */ + u8 reserved; +}; + union dlm_query_join_response { u32 intval; - struct { - u8 code; /* Response code. dlm_minor and fs_minor - are only valid if this is JOIN_OK */ - u8 dlm_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the - dlm is speaking. */ - u8 fs_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the - filesystem is speaking. */ - u8 reserved; - } packet; + struct dlm_query_join_packet packet; }; struct dlm_lock_request diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c index 906974cfbf18..0879d86113e3 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c @@ -713,14 +713,46 @@ static int dlm_query_join_proto_check(char *proto_type, int node, return rc; } +/* + * struct dlm_query_join_packet is made up of four one-byte fields. They + * are effectively in big-endian order already. However, little-endian + * machines swap them before putting the packet on the wire (because + * query_join's response is a status, and that status is treated as a u32 + * on the wire). Thus, a big-endian and little-endian machines will treat + * this structure differently. + * + * The solution is to have little-endian machines swap the structure when + * converting from the structure to the u32 representation. This will + * result in the structure having the correct format on the wire no matter + * the host endian format. + */ +static void dlm_query_join_packet_to_wire(struct dlm_query_join_packet *packet, + u32 *wire) +{ + union dlm_query_join_response response; + + response.packet = *packet; + *wire = cpu_to_be32(response.intval); +} + +static void dlm_query_join_wire_to_packet(u32 wire, + struct dlm_query_join_packet *packet) +{ + union dlm_query_join_response response; + + response.intval = cpu_to_be32(wire); + *packet = response.packet; +} + static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, void **ret_data) { struct dlm_query_join_request *query; - union dlm_query_join_response response = { - .packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW, + struct dlm_query_join_packet packet = { + .code = JOIN_DISALLOW, }; struct dlm_ctxt *dlm = NULL; + u32 response; u8 nodenum; query = (struct dlm_query_join_request *) msg->buf; @@ -737,11 +769,11 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, mlog(0, "node %u is not in our live map yet\n", query->node_idx); - response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; + packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; goto respond; } - response.packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP; + packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP; spin_lock(&dlm_domain_lock); dlm = __dlm_lookup_domain_full(query->domain, query->name_len); @@ -760,7 +792,7 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, mlog(0, "disallow join as node %u does not " "have node %u in its nodemap\n", query->node_idx, nodenum); - response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; + packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; goto unlock_respond; } } @@ -780,23 +812,23 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, /*If this is a brand new context and we * haven't started our join process yet, then * the other node won the race. */ - response.packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP; + packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP; } else if (dlm->joining_node != DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN) { /* Disallow parallel joins. */ - response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; + packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; } else if (dlm->reco.state & DLM_RECO_STATE_ACTIVE) { mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but recovery " "is ongoing.\n", bit); - response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; + packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; } else if (test_bit(bit, dlm->recovery_map)) { mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but it " "still needs recovery.\n", bit); - response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; + packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; } else if (test_bit(bit, dlm->domain_map)) { mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but it " "is still in the domain! needs recovery?\n", bit); - response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; + packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW; } else { /* Alright we're fully a part of this domain * so we keep some state as to who's joining @@ -807,19 +839,15 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, if (dlm_query_join_proto_check("DLM", bit, &dlm->dlm_locking_proto, &query->dlm_proto)) { - response.packet.code = - JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH; + packet.code = JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH; } else if (dlm_query_join_proto_check("fs", bit, &dlm->fs_locking_proto, &query->fs_proto)) { - response.packet.code = - JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH; + packet.code = JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH; } else { - response.packet.dlm_minor = - query->dlm_proto.pv_minor; - response.packet.fs_minor = - query->fs_proto.pv_minor; - response.packet.code = JOIN_OK; + packet.dlm_minor = query->dlm_proto.pv_minor; + packet.fs_minor = query->fs_proto.pv_minor; + packet.code = JOIN_OK; __dlm_set_joining_node(dlm, query->node_idx); } } @@ -830,9 +858,10 @@ unlock_respond: spin_unlock(&dlm_domain_lock); respond: - mlog(0, "We respond with %u\n", response.packet.code); + mlog(0, "We respond with %u\n", packet.code); - return response.intval; + dlm_query_join_packet_to_wire(&packet, &response); + return response; } static int dlm_assert_joined_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, @@ -968,7 +997,8 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, { int status; struct dlm_query_join_request join_msg; - union dlm_query_join_response join_resp; + struct dlm_query_join_packet packet; + u32 join_resp; mlog(0, "querying node %d\n", node); @@ -984,11 +1014,12 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, status = o2net_send_message(DLM_QUERY_JOIN_MSG, DLM_MOD_KEY, &join_msg, sizeof(join_msg), node, - &join_resp.intval); + &join_resp); if (status < 0 && status != -ENOPROTOOPT) { mlog_errno(status); goto bail; } + dlm_query_join_wire_to_packet(join_resp, &packet); /* -ENOPROTOOPT from the net code means the other side isn't listening for our message type -- that's fine, it means @@ -997,10 +1028,10 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, if (status == -ENOPROTOOPT) { status = 0; *response = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP; - } else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_DISALLOW || - join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_OK_NO_MAP) { - *response = join_resp.packet.code; - } else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH) { + } else if (packet.code == JOIN_DISALLOW || + packet.code == JOIN_OK_NO_MAP) { + *response = packet.code; + } else if (packet.code == JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH) { mlog(ML_NOTICE, "This node requested DLM locking protocol %u.%u and " "filesystem locking protocol %u.%u. At least one of " @@ -1012,14 +1043,12 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor, node); status = -EPROTO; - *response = join_resp.packet.code; - } else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_OK) { - *response = join_resp.packet.code; + *response = packet.code; + } else if (packet.code == JOIN_OK) { + *response = packet.code; /* Use the same locking protocol as the remote node */ - dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor = - join_resp.packet.dlm_minor; - dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor = - join_resp.packet.fs_minor; + dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.dlm_minor; + dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.fs_minor; mlog(0, "Node %d responds JOIN_OK with DLM locking protocol " "%u.%u and fs locking protocol %u.%u\n", @@ -1031,11 +1060,11 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, } else { status = -EINVAL; mlog(ML_ERROR, "invalid response %d from node %u\n", - join_resp.packet.code, node); + packet.code, node); } mlog(0, "status %d, node %d response is %d\n", status, node, - *response); + *response); bail: return status; -- 2.30.2