From 13c15e07eedf26092054c8c71f2f47edb8388310 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boris Brezillon Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:20:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mtd: spinand: Handle the case where PROGRAM LOAD does not reset the cache Looks like PROGRAM LOAD (AKA write cache) does not necessarily reset the cache content to 0xFF (depends on vendor implementation), so we must fill the page cache entirely even if we only want to program the data portion of the page, otherwise we might corrupt the BBM or user data previously programmed in OOB area. Fixes: 7529df465248 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to support SPI NANDs") Reported-by: Stefan Roese Cc: Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Tested-by: Stefan Roese Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese Acked-by: Miquel Raynal --- drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c index 479c2f2cf17f..8bf37da19663 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c @@ -304,24 +304,30 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, struct nand_device *nand = spinand_to_nand(spinand); struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand); struct nand_page_io_req adjreq = *req; - unsigned int nbytes = 0; - void *buf = NULL; + void *buf = spinand->databuf; + unsigned int nbytes; u16 column = 0; int ret; - memset(spinand->databuf, 0xff, - nanddev_page_size(nand) + - nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand)); + /* + * Looks like PROGRAM LOAD (AKA write cache) does not necessarily reset + * the cache content to 0xFF (depends on vendor implementation), so we + * must fill the page cache entirely even if we only want to program + * the data portion of the page, otherwise we might corrupt the BBM or + * user data previously programmed in OOB area. + */ + nbytes = nanddev_page_size(nand) + nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); + memset(spinand->databuf, 0xff, nbytes); + adjreq.dataoffs = 0; + adjreq.datalen = nanddev_page_size(nand); + adjreq.databuf.out = spinand->databuf; + adjreq.ooblen = nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); + adjreq.ooboffs = 0; + adjreq.oobbuf.out = spinand->oobbuf; - if (req->datalen) { + if (req->datalen) memcpy(spinand->databuf + req->dataoffs, req->databuf.out, req->datalen); - adjreq.dataoffs = 0; - adjreq.datalen = nanddev_page_size(nand); - adjreq.databuf.out = spinand->databuf; - nbytes = adjreq.datalen; - buf = spinand->databuf; - } if (req->ooblen) { if (req->mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB) @@ -332,14 +338,6 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, else memcpy(spinand->oobbuf + req->ooboffs, req->oobbuf.out, req->ooblen); - - adjreq.ooblen = nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); - adjreq.ooboffs = 0; - nbytes += nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); - if (!buf) { - buf = spinand->oobbuf; - column = nanddev_page_size(nand); - } } spinand_cache_op_adjust_colum(spinand, &adjreq, &column); @@ -370,8 +368,8 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, /* * We need to use the RANDOM LOAD CACHE operation if there's - * more than one iteration, because the LOAD operation resets - * the cache to 0xff. + * more than one iteration, because the LOAD operation might + * reset the cache to 0xff. */ if (nbytes) { column = op.addr.val; -- 2.30.2