From 1712fb1a2f6829150032ac76eb0e39b82a549cfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wentalou Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:13:05 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: amdgpu_device_recover_vram always failed if only one node in shadow_list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit amdgpu_bo_restore_shadow would assign zero to r if succeeded. r would remain zero if there is only one node in shadow_list. current code would always return failure when r <= 0. restart the timeout for each wait was a rather problematic bug as well. The value of tmo SHOULD be changed, otherwise we wait tmo jiffies on each loop. Signed-off-by: Wentao Lou Reviewed-by: Christian König Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c index ac0d646a7b74..5d8b30fd4534 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c @@ -3173,11 +3173,16 @@ static int amdgpu_device_recover_vram(struct amdgpu_device *adev) break; if (fence) { - r = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, false, tmo); + tmo = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, false, tmo); dma_fence_put(fence); fence = next; - if (r <= 0) + if (tmo == 0) { + r = -ETIMEDOUT; break; + } else if (tmo < 0) { + r = tmo; + break; + } } else { fence = next; } @@ -3188,8 +3193,8 @@ static int amdgpu_device_recover_vram(struct amdgpu_device *adev) tmo = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, false, tmo); dma_fence_put(fence); - if (r <= 0 || tmo <= 0) { - DRM_ERROR("recover vram bo from shadow failed\n"); + if (r < 0 || tmo <= 0) { + DRM_ERROR("recover vram bo from shadow failed, r is %ld, tmo is %ld\n", r, tmo); return -EIO; } -- 2.30.2