From 526949e877f44672d408bfe291e39860c13f2e24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:18:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] rxrpc: avoid clang -Wuninitialized warning clang produces a false-positive warning as it fails to notice that "lost = true" implies that "ret" is initialized: net/rxrpc/output.c:402:6: error: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized] if (lost) ^~~~ net/rxrpc/output.c:437:6: note: uninitialized use occurs here if (ret >= 0) { ^~~ net/rxrpc/output.c:402:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false if (lost) ^~~~~~~~~ net/rxrpc/output.c:339:9: note: initialize the variable 'ret' to silence this warning int ret, opt; ^ = 0 Rearrange the code to make that more obvious and avoid the warning. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/rxrpc/output.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rxrpc/output.c b/net/rxrpc/output.c index 736aa9281100..004c762c2e8d 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/output.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/output.c @@ -335,7 +335,6 @@ int rxrpc_send_data_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb, struct kvec iov[2]; rxrpc_serial_t serial; size_t len; - bool lost = false; int ret, opt; _enter(",{%d}", skb->len); @@ -393,14 +392,14 @@ int rxrpc_send_data_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb, static int lose; if ((lose++ & 7) == 7) { ret = 0; - lost = true; + trace_rxrpc_tx_data(call, sp->hdr.seq, serial, + whdr.flags, retrans, true); + goto done; } } - trace_rxrpc_tx_data(call, sp->hdr.seq, serial, whdr.flags, - retrans, lost); - if (lost) - goto done; + trace_rxrpc_tx_data(call, sp->hdr.seq, serial, whdr.flags, retrans, + false); /* send the packet with the don't fragment bit set if we currently * think it's small enough */ -- 2.30.2