From 5478ba349f3f71f8d306cddaed33fa0527cc7b16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:18:06 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Rename and split top-level consistency checks to match SDM Rename the top-level consistency check functions to (loosely) align with the SDM. Historically, KVM has used the terms "prereq" and "postreq" to differentiate between consistency checks that lead to VM-Fail and those that lead to VM-Exit. The terms are vague and potentially misleading, e.g. "postreq" might be interpreted as occurring after VM-Entry. Note, while the SDM lumps controls and host state into a single section, "Checks on VMX Controls and Host-State Area", split them into separate top-level functions as the two categories of checks result in different VM instruction errors. This split will allow for additional cleanup. Note #2, "vmentry" is intentionally dropped from the new function names to avoid confusion with nested_check_vm_entry_controls(), and to keep the length of the functions names somewhat manageable. Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Reviewed-by: Krish Sadhukhan Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c index a02d2e3ded33..97cc17effce2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c @@ -2589,6 +2589,17 @@ static int nested_check_vm_entry_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return 0; } +static int nested_vmx_check_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) +{ + if (nested_check_vm_execution_controls(vcpu, vmcs12) || + nested_check_vm_exit_controls(vcpu, vmcs12) || + nested_check_vm_entry_controls(vcpu, vmcs12)) + return VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD; + + return 0; +} + /* * Checks related to Host Control Registers and MSRs */ @@ -2628,14 +2639,9 @@ static int nested_check_host_control_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return 0; } -static int nested_vmx_check_vmentry_prereqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, - struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) +static int nested_vmx_check_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) { - if (nested_check_vm_execution_controls(vcpu, vmcs12) || - nested_check_vm_exit_controls(vcpu, vmcs12) || - nested_check_vm_entry_controls(vcpu, vmcs12)) - return VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD; - if (nested_check_host_control_regs(vcpu, vmcs12)) return VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD; @@ -2681,9 +2687,9 @@ static int nested_check_guest_non_reg_state(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) return 0; } -static int nested_vmx_check_vmentry_postreqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, - struct vmcs12 *vmcs12, - u32 *exit_qual) +static int nested_vmx_check_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12, + u32 *exit_qual) { bool ia32e; @@ -3008,7 +3014,7 @@ int nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool from_vmentry) return -1; } - if (nested_vmx_check_vmentry_postreqs(vcpu, vmcs12, &exit_qual)) + if (nested_vmx_check_guest_state(vcpu, vmcs12, &exit_qual)) goto vmentry_fail_vmexit; } @@ -3153,7 +3159,11 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch) launch ? VMXERR_VMLAUNCH_NONCLEAR_VMCS : VMXERR_VMRESUME_NONLAUNCHED_VMCS); - ret = nested_vmx_check_vmentry_prereqs(vcpu, vmcs12); + ret = nested_vmx_check_controls(vcpu, vmcs12); + if (ret) + return nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, ret); + + ret = nested_vmx_check_host_state(vcpu, vmcs12); if (ret) return nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, ret); @@ -5488,8 +5498,9 @@ static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return -EINVAL; } - if (nested_vmx_check_vmentry_prereqs(vcpu, vmcs12) || - nested_vmx_check_vmentry_postreqs(vcpu, vmcs12, &exit_qual)) + if (nested_vmx_check_controls(vcpu, vmcs12) || + nested_vmx_check_host_state(vcpu, vmcs12) || + nested_vmx_check_guest_state(vcpu, vmcs12, &exit_qual)) return -EINVAL; vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 = true; -- 2.30.2