From 74e938c22705c7b80d4422e84eea927fc78e60a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Brandenburg Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:01:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] orangefs: reverse sense of is-inode-stale test in d_revalidate If a dentry is deleted, then a dentry is recreated with the same handle but a different type (i.e. it was a file and now it's a symlink), then its a different inode. The check was backwards, so d_revalidate would not have noticed. Due to the design of the OrangeFS server, this is rather unlikely. It's also possible for the dentry to be deleted and recreated with the same type. This would be undetectable. It's a bit of a ship of Theseus. Signed-off-by: Martin Brandenburg Signed-off-by: Mike Marshall --- fs/orangefs/dcache.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/orangefs/dcache.c b/fs/orangefs/dcache.c index be06e1532a3b..fe484cf93e5c 100644 --- a/fs/orangefs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/orangefs/dcache.c @@ -118,8 +118,12 @@ static int orangefs_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags) return 0; /* We do not need to continue with negative dentries. */ - if (!dentry->d_inode) - goto out; + if (!dentry->d_inode) { + gossip_debug(GOSSIP_DCACHE_DEBUG, + "%s: negative dentry or positive dentry and inode valid.\n", + __func__); + return 1; + } /* Now we must perform a getattr to validate the inode contents. */ @@ -129,14 +133,7 @@ static int orangefs_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags) __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__); return 0; } - if (ret == 0) - return 0; - -out: - gossip_debug(GOSSIP_DCACHE_DEBUG, - "%s: negative dentry or positive dentry and inode valid.\n", - __func__); - return 1; + return !ret; } const struct dentry_operations orangefs_dentry_operations = { -- 2.30.2