From 7f2a52555998c699a7e89f24636c909d6fc08a60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roland McGrath Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:02:50 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] wait4 PTRACE_ATTACH race fix Back about a year ago when I last fiddled heavily with the do_wait code, I was thinking too hard about the wrong thing and I now think I introduced a bug whose inverse thought I was fixing. Apparently noone was looking too hard over much shoulder, so as to cite my bogus reasoning at the time. In the race condition when PTRACE_ATTACH is about to steal a child and then the child hits a tracing event (what my_ptrace_child checks for), the real parent does need to set its flag noting it has some eligible live children. Otherwise a spurious ECHILD error is possible, since the child in question is not yet on the ptrace_children list. Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/exit.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 6ef8f7356a74..2d39ccc367e6 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -1383,6 +1383,15 @@ repeat: switch (p->state) { case TASK_TRACED: + /* + * When we hit the race with PTRACE_ATTACH, + * we will not report this child. But the + * race means it has not yet been moved to + * our ptrace_children list, so we need to + * set the flag here to avoid a spurious ECHILD + * when the race happens with the only child. + */ + flag = 1; if (!my_ptrace_child(p)) continue; /*FALLTHROUGH*/ -- 2.30.2