From 7f59b1bfa3149c81b332a8c2c3935111d97a5b20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Cox Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:49:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Staging: et131x: Clean up the receive arrays We don't use them for anything having stripped out the debug gunge in the original driver. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c | 19 +------------------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c b/drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c index 5d17abdf7119..f8fee252a944 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c +++ b/drivers/staging/et131x/et1310_rx.c @@ -1076,10 +1076,7 @@ void et131x_reset_recv(struct et131x_adapter *etdev) void et131x_handle_recv_interrupt(struct et131x_adapter *etdev) { PMP_RFD rfd = NULL; - struct sk_buff *packets[NUM_PACKETS_HANDLED]; - PMP_RFD freed[NUM_PACKETS_HANDLED]; u32 count = 0; - u32 nfree = 0; bool done = true; /* Process up to available RFD's */ @@ -1110,24 +1107,10 @@ void et131x_handle_recv_interrupt(struct et131x_adapter *etdev) etdev->Stats.ipackets++; /* Set the status on the packet, either resources or success */ - if (etdev->RxRing.nReadyRecv >= RFD_LOW_WATER_MARK) { - /* Put this RFD on the pending list - * - * NOTE: nic_rx_pkts() above is already returning the - * RFD to the RecvList, so don't additionally do that - * here. - * Besides, we don't really need (at this point) the - * pending list anyway. - */ - } else { - freed[nfree] = rfd; - nfree++; - + if (etdev->RxRing.nReadyRecv < RFD_LOW_WATER_MARK) { dev_warn(&etdev->pdev->dev, "RFD's are running out\n"); } - - packets[count] = rfd->Packet; count++; } -- 2.30.2