From 98d291708cbaab06efec195d0810a7ef60f7603a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kees Cook Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:18:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than "initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.) Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler Reviewed-by: James Morris Reviewed-by: John Johansen Signed-off-by: James Morris --- security/security.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index 736e78da1ab9..4cbcf244a965 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -72,10 +72,11 @@ int __init security_init(void) int i; struct hlist_head *list = (struct hlist_head *) &security_hook_heads; + pr_info("Security Framework initializing\n"); + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(security_hook_heads) / sizeof(struct hlist_head); i++) INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&list[i]); - pr_info("Security Framework initialized\n"); /* * Load minor LSMs, with the capability module always first. -- 2.30.2