From a7c0b8bee212e22725196fda8389bff9ade3ac68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Hocko Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:54:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] amd-xgbe: use PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER in xgbe_map_rx_buffer xgbe_map_rx_buffer is rather confused about what PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER means. It uses PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER-1 assuming that PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER is the first costly order which is not the case actually because orders larger than that are costly. And even that applies only to sleeping allocations which is not the case here. We simply do not perform any costly operations like reclaim or compaction for those. Simplify the code by dropping the order calculation and use PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER directly. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Tom Lendacky Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-desc.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-desc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-desc.c index b3bc87fe3764..0a98c369df20 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-desc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-desc.c @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int xgbe_map_rx_buffer(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata, struct xgbe_ring *ring, struct xgbe_ring_data *rdata) { - int order, ret; + int ret; if (!ring->rx_hdr_pa.pages) { ret = xgbe_alloc_pages(pdata, &ring->rx_hdr_pa, GFP_ATOMIC, 0); @@ -333,9 +333,8 @@ static int xgbe_map_rx_buffer(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata, } if (!ring->rx_buf_pa.pages) { - order = max_t(int, PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER - 1, 0); ret = xgbe_alloc_pages(pdata, &ring->rx_buf_pa, GFP_ATOMIC, - order); + PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER); if (ret) return ret; } -- 2.30.2