From cda70ba8c05a8661f882862c4699a31d215ab151 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sunil Mushran Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:34:58 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2/dlm: Remove BUG_ON in dlm recovery when freeing locks of a dead node During recovery, the dlm frees the locks for the dead node. If it finds a lock in a resource for the dead node, it expects that node to also have a ref in that lock resource. If not, it BUGs. ossbz#1175 was filed with the above BUG. Now, while it is correct that we should be expecting the ref, I see no reason why we have to BUG. After all, we are freeing up the lock and clearing the ref. This patch replaces the BUG_ON with a printk(). Hopefully, that will give us more clues next time this happens. http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1175 Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran Acked-by: Mark Fasheh Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c index ad712211d4ea..344bcf90cbf4 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c @@ -2243,7 +2243,12 @@ static void dlm_free_dead_locks(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: freed %u locks for dead node %u, " "dropping ref from lockres\n", dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, freed, dead_node); - BUG_ON(!test_bit(dead_node, res->refmap)); + if(!test_bit(dead_node, res->refmap)) { + mlog(ML_ERROR, "%s:%.*s: freed %u locks for dead node %u, " + "but ref was not set\n", dlm->name, + res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, freed, dead_node); + __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res); + } dlm_lockres_clear_refmap_bit(dead_node, res); } else if (test_bit(dead_node, res->refmap)) { mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: dead node %u had a ref, but had " -- 2.30.2