From d354a6f150d873440975263530a2e42121d50a51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Saeger Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:23:48 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: fix ref to workqueue content Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- .../Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html index e5d0bbd0230b..7394f034be65 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ grace period also drove it to completion. This straightforward approach had the disadvantage of needing to account for POSIX signals sent to user tasks, so more recent implemementations use the Linux kernel's -workqueues. +workqueues.

The requesting task still does counter snapshotting and funnel-lock -- 2.30.2