From e1e5b3ff41983f506c3cbcf123fe7d682f61a8f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Beulich Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:03:49 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] xenbus: prefer list_for_each() This is more efficient than list_for_each_safe() when list modification is accompanied by breaking out of the loop. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Signed-off-by: David Vrabel --- drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c index 7487971f9f78..fe60b12de920 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ out: static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned msg_type, struct xenbus_file_priv *u) { - struct watch_adapter *watch, *tmp_watch; + struct watch_adapter *watch; char *path, *token; int err, rc; LIST_HEAD(staging_q); @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned msg_type, struct xenbus_file_priv *u) } list_add(&watch->list, &u->watches); } else { - list_for_each_entry_safe(watch, tmp_watch, &u->watches, list) { + list_for_each_entry(watch, &u->watches, list) { if (!strcmp(watch->token, token) && !strcmp(watch->watch.node, path)) { unregister_xenbus_watch(&watch->watch); -- 2.30.2