From e5e26d75f490d7d41f25a4b39ed6db1713beb417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: stephen hemminger Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] netdev: use list_first_entry macro Use list_first_entry macro; no longer any need to use 'next' directly in list to find first entry. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/dev.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 1968980f513a..eb7f1a4fefc6 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -3018,7 +3018,7 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h) * entries to the tail of this list, and only ->poll() * calls can remove this head entry from the list. */ - n = list_entry(list->next, struct napi_struct, poll_list); + n = list_first_entry(list, struct napi_struct, poll_list); have = netpoll_poll_lock(n); @@ -4882,7 +4882,7 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head) } /* Process any work delayed until the end of the batch */ - dev = list_entry(head->next, struct net_device, unreg_list); + dev = list_first_entry(head, struct net_device, unreg_list); call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, dev); synchronize_net(); @@ -5268,7 +5268,7 @@ void netdev_run_todo(void) while (!list_empty(&list)) { struct net_device *dev - = list_entry(list.next, struct net_device, todo_list); + = list_first_entry(&list, struct net_device, todo_list); list_del(&dev->todo_list); if (unlikely(dev->reg_state != NETREG_UNREGISTERING)) { -- 2.30.2