From febeca6d375531f2d3244b47bf0eb396180689e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chao Yu Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 18:29:08 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: don't track newly allocated nat entry in list We will never persist newly allocated nat entries during checkpoint(), so we don't need to track such nat entries in nat dirty list in order to avoid: - more latency during traversing dirty list; - sorting nat sets incorrectly due to recording wrong entry_cnt in nat entry set. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/node.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index d22db8ce0a69..05700e54f91e 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c @@ -158,9 +158,6 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t set = NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(ne->ni.nid); struct nat_entry_set *head; - if (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY)) - return; - head = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set); if (!head) { head = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_set_slab, GFP_NOFS); @@ -171,10 +168,18 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, head->entry_cnt = 0; f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set, head); } - list_move_tail(&ne->list, &head->entry_list); + + if (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY)) + goto refresh_list; + nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++; head->entry_cnt++; set_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY, true); +refresh_list: + if (nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR) + list_del_init(&ne->list); + else + list_move_tail(&ne->list, &head->entry_list); } static void __clear_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, @@ -2423,8 +2428,7 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid = nat_get_nid(ne); int offset; - if (nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR) - continue; + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR); if (to_journal) { offset = lookup_journal_in_cursum(journal, -- 2.30.2